Just a little intellectual debate at three a.m.
I’m a little conflicted regarding the legitimacy of Chronic Lyme as I had brilliant biochemist professor who was involved in research on the subject and was adament of its existence. I’m really not qualified to give an opinion either way, but there are genuine motivations for lobbyists funding its discrediting. For those of you getting more interested, “Under Our Skin” is a documentary regarding the political intent and massive breadth of money involved in chronic Lyme disease.
I’m a little conflicted regarding the legitimacy of prenuptial agreements. As I had brilliant a Tamaratattles.com spy who was involved in research on the subject of prenuptials and alimony . Allegedly. I’m really not qualified to give an opinion either way, (legal or otherwise) but there are genuine motivations for a hypothetical woman taking such a dire approach and massive breadth of money involved in prenuptial agreements. Allegedly.
For those of you getting more interested, here is the case law .Under California Family Code 1612(c) prenuptial agreements THE WAIVING OF SPOUSAL SUPPORT is not enforced where doing so would be “unconscionable.” There is a pre-existing case where a court ruled that leaving a spouse who was BRAIN DAMAGED ruled that leaving someone in such a state would be considered UNCONSCIONABLE. And thus the spouse, even though she agreed in the prenuptial to forgo spousal support, would then be entitled to it. Example of BRAIN DAMAGE may or my not include being unable to read, write or drive a car within the past three years of a four year marriage someone wanted to bail on , after year one. I USE THAT AS A HYPOTHETICAL. Please see here. “Courts cannot permit one spouse to discard his or her disabled spouse without providing spousal support, even when a spousal support waiver in a premarital agreement would permit the same, if it would be unconscionable to do so at the time enforcement of the waiver is sought.”
So if say, said spouse HYPOTHETICALLY has three kids and was receiving oh I dunno… let’s say 10K per kid a month from the previous husband, and those kids were all now heading toward adulthood and that $360,000 a year TAX FREE was over and husband number two who had been paying all the bills for the FIRST year anyway was done with her. What’s a girl to do? How does one acquire brain damage? How would someone in that position renegotiate a prenuptial agreement?
Well, Psylocke, this brilliant law professor I know said that there are some really controversial diseases out there that might make it necessary for the spouses to come to some sort of agreement. And then they could “grow apart” and one spouse could have a miraculous recovery after posting many, many sad shots of them getting vitamin C by IV only.
That’s what my brilliant legal friend of mind told me once. It would be great if TMZ would acknowledge me before posting this tomorrow….
Allegedly in theory.
*This post is not based on actual people other than those in the lawsuit. No medical advice should be implied by this post. Any resemblance to actual people is entirely coincidental. TamaraTattles.com is not responsible for any implications made by commenters and make no suggestions to any relevance to any other post on this site. It is simply banter with a commenter.
UPDATE: It just occurred to me, what if she ALLEGEDLY had to support two kids with the same illness and one of them was still under 18? Could she go back for more from the father? The second husband? This would be an interesting case indeed!
Theoretically, the kind thing to do would be to find some sort of financial agreement over the course of years and then tweet about how good one’s spouse is to the other. Because that would make everything make sense. Then one could have a rapid recovery from their brain damage in time for the next season. Um I mean soon. Allegedly.