I love a good court case. And when two abject idiots are in court duking it out, it almost makes me want to shove Banjo in a crate and fly out to La La Land to watch this go down live. It does however pain me to be on Brandi Glanville’s side about ANYTHING, but in this case I must.
Joanna Krupa is dumber than a box of hair. I get she wants to make Brandi squirm and make pay huge attorney bills for saying that Joanna’s “pussy smells like fish.” But in doing all that, she is keeping herself in the news. Whether or not Joanna’s lady garden smells like sunshine and roses or rotting fish is not the issue here. Joanna just seems to be trying to stay on the tabloids no matter how stupid she looks in the process.
Dragging someone to court over typical housewives taunting is a waste of the court’s time and everyone’s money. Brandi has hired a new attorney, or found one who will work pro bono for the sheer joy of being a part of this case, and said attorney has a lot of questions for Joanna with regard to her allegedly malodorous lady garden.
TMZ has released just one of what I suspect are many questions intended to plumb the vast and deep depths of the plaintiff’s vagina regions.
“Brandi’s lawyer has fired off a series of written questions which Joanna must answer under oath, notably:
“Is it your contention in this lawsuit that your vagina and/or vulva are odorless? If yes, please explain with specificity why your vagina and/or vulva are odorless.”
It would seem Brandi and her attorney are going down a path that could lead to some interesting courtroom testimony … and demonstrations.”
I really hope one of my LA spies is available to sit in the courtroom for this one.
What do you guys think about this? Will there be a smell test? I really want there to be a smell test. I love when the plaintiff gets stuck in these situations.
It reminds me of Parks v Stanton where Angela Stanton is all ready for a trial, and yet, the plaintiff, Ms. Parks keeps on delaying. I know she expected Angela to fold buy now but that is NOT going to happen. You really don’t want to miss a single post about that case, click here for the list of posts.
I ROARED when I read this. I think I actually peed a little because, #MenopausalMama. Wish I was in LA to sit for this one.
Brandi is very proud of having a period.
You should try one too.
LOL.
I deleted Sammi’s slanderous and ridiculous post. On the off chance Brandi’s attorney already saw it and wants her IP and email to take her to court, I’d be happy to share…
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
Ah Hell, TT…..
Without Sammi’s run- on rant about Brandi, my period comment makes me look a crazy person.
Oh well…….it was damn funny.
This is SO embarrassing.
For every single person involved.
For our whole legal system. This actually makes me sick. What a bunch of clowns. Man oh man these two deserve each other. This is all some kind of bad dream.
Totally! How humiliating! Just drop it already.
This request is almost worse than the original accusation. As a member of the medical/legal profession I am embarrassed that an attorney would even put this question to someone. How can you prove a negative? Is she supposed to go into court bare her private parts and let the jury each take a whiff? Brandi is a crass, dirty, creep for doing this.
If you are suing someone for saying that your vagina stinks, then you will be asked about the scent of your vagina in court.
I do not get why this is shocking news to anyone.
The defense to slander is truth. Unless the plaintiff knew or should have known that what she said was false, she has no case.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
This is hilarious. I wish I could quit my job just to go watch the show.
Petty, childish, malodorous — the entire thing stinks. Please stop the insanity. Andy must be on his knees, somewhere on a NY sidewalk saying “hallelujah, payday.”
I don’t know which is worse..the one who started this or the one who will not drop it and let it go…embarrassing as F&@k Ladies
Scratch and Sniff Reference cards have probably been ordered for comparison…Trout, Flounder, Grouper, Shrimp, Crabs…
You forgot Snapper 🙂
…and allow me to add the Whiff, the Deep-sea smelt, and my personal favorite, the White Croaker 😉
Gross.
hilarious
Salmon, tilapia, squid, halibutt, octopuss, and let’s not forget a Chinese delicacy — sea slug.
Sorry this is not about fishy vajayjays, but I wanted to give a heads up that part three of the rhonyc reunion is on tonight. I was surprised to see it as Thursdays are for Project Runway.
cannot wait for part three of rhony. my fav. made early dinner;
and now the men are on their own. locking myself in my bedroom.
love bethenney, her acerbic humor is just my style. big city girl
oh, and yes re: the two bimbo’s brandie and joanne. sorry, but
I vote for brandie as most offensive. she is the true bottom of the
cesspool. she just cannot stand anyone prettier than her. newsflash
she is really ugly, inside and out. no man will ever marry her
Katek whoa, “no man will ever marry her”, is that a goal?
These’s ppl really need to grow up wth this childish Bullsh!t.
This is great, you cannot make this shit up. How do you prove or disprove? My god the possibilities are endless, this would be so great with a bowl of popcorn and a cocktail. Is there no level to which some of these women will stay above? I do love a good shit show, let the games begin.
I know! This is kick ass entertainment! I would love to see this go to trial, though admittedly appalled to the waste of time of the legal system, the sheer entertainment value overrides my other (appalled) sensibilities. Can you imagine?! The expert testimony! The witnesses! Mr. X, have you smelled the plaintiffs vaginal/vulva area? Do you know what smelly fish actually smells like?
Someone should parody this to ‘Smelly Cat.’
Smelly Vag. Smelly Vag.
Isn’t she cleaning you?
Smelly Vag. Smelly Vag.
It’s not your fault.
(Allegedly
I know, it makes me giggle out loud and I love it. I totally can see it and Joanna having Roman say it isn’t stinky
And, isn’t the pleasantness or offensiveness of the odor just the opinion of the person doing the sniffing? LOL Will the judge and jurors line up to give her the sniff test? Will the verdict be based on a majority vote? Will the defense employ a professional expert vagina ‘smeller’? What is stinky to one might smell light and fresh to someone else. LOL Gawd, what a tangled web of nonsense all of this is. I’d love to be in LA and sit thru the testimony.
Yes. I was gonna say the exact same thing but was to lazy to type it.
Shit show? No, that’s another malodorous region. 🙂
Comedians everywhere are celebrating future stand-up routines. I wonder what Brandi smelled like when she meandered down the street with her tampon hanging out?
I have to disagree with you. I know you’re shocked. Joanna HAS to keep this going! Because of the simple fact that the mention of her name or sight of her face instantly conjured up “smelly vagina” in my mind and in others’. No amount of denial can change that, can it? So her only hope is to make people hear it so much that they are desensitized and the shock and novelty have worn of. It’s already worked that way for me. Think about it.
And really, if Brandi’s “lawyer” actually wrote those questions and is REALLY using the strategy thT her parts do in fact stink, they should be disbarred and sued as well. That’s some fucked up shit right there. Arrogant and crude. Which should be on Brandi’s headstone. Soon hopefully.
Further, Mohammad and whatersface (“I have lymes disease oh wait it’s just my fake jug leaking never mind” — can we call that lames disease?) should be seriously pissed at Brandi for allowing this to keep going. It’s an embarrassment to them and their children. A classless whorey spectacle.
I adore you TeeCee66. Loved this post.
…I agree.
Totally agree!
AGREED…..well said.
I totally agree Teecee
Wow! I am clotheslined by this.
Mohamed Hadid found it rancid and putrid compared to his usual fare so there’s no need to doubt it was one horrific rotten crotch that Krupa presented at that time and place.
Except he says Brandi lied. That she made it up.
Yes, its a he smells/she says situation.
HA.
Or rather a he says/she smells situation.
Actually, he was very adamant and very outspoken when he heard what Brandi said. he called her a filthy liar.
Yeah… I don’t get why that’s not enough to shut this shit show down.
Double slander.
This line of her lawyer’s questioning would make sense if Brandi smelled it, said it and Joanna said it was slander. However, Brandi didnt say it. She said Mohammed talked about the smell of her vagina in front of Lisa. Both have already denied it.
Brandi needs to prove THEY said it. If they repeat their denials under oath and Brandi has no other witnesses, Joanna has proven her case. Because the statement is so HORRIBLE and DISGUSTING that any reasonable person would agree that it meets the definition of slander.
.
Actually, you are wrong. Joanna is going to have to prove that what Brandi said was a lie. Brandi has repeatedly said that Joanna’s parts stink. Brandi’s attorney much find some sort of proof of Joanna’s errr. scent.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
If Joanna was seen regularly by an Ob/Gyn they could produce medical records which had no mention of “off odors”.
Oh so even though Brandi said that Mohammed and Lisa said it and both deny it, Jo has to prove she doesnt smell?
More tea, also could you or would you be modeling underwear if you had a nasty smell??
I think it’s even MORE specific than that Ms TT. Joanna will submit interrogatories asking Brandi when/how many times she personally smelled Jo’s box, and details surrounding Brandi’s personal knowledge. If she has no knowledge, she is basing her statements on the words of others. Then uh oh. Fun at the courthouse.
Actually, the fact that Brandi has never smelled said lady garden proves her side. She had no way of knowing if it was true or not. Still up to the plaintiff to prove it is not true.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
No Tamara. You are obviously ignorant about the law. Brandy said that Mohammed told her this bs and Mohammed has denied saying it. That is the issue
Oh I see. It’s not a slander case at all. It’s a he said/she said issue. We should inform the attorneys on both sides about this revelation. Clearly you know the case so well.
Have a fucking seat.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
No way in hell the judge will allow that kind of questioning. Joanna will not be forced into proving anything about her vagina. And as far as your assumption that Joanna is keeping the issue in the news, check your own headings… they all revolve around Brandi.
I realize you dislike Joanna over a completely different issue, but you’ve picked the wrong side this time.
We shall see. Joanna will never win this case.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
I would think that it would be easy to get an obgyn wellness exam with a ” no foul SMELL” or no known medical condition is found that would create any foul odor..the medical opinion would be the only expert opinion here with this case. On the flip side i thought it was slanderous to say things about people that you cannot prove…weird legal angle to me.
The doctor could only prove that her parts didn’t smell on the day of the office visit.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
When you sue someone in a civil case, the proof of the burden is on you; in this case, on Joanna Krupa. I dislike Brandi, but I feel a little sorry for her. I despite Krupa. Allegedly and also alluded to on the RHOBH or Miami, not sure, that Krupa was the mistress that broke up Yolanda’s marriage. Yolanda always talks about how “Brandi has her back” so she has Brandi’s back. My guess is that Brandi made that statement on behalf of Yolanda as a gesture of ‘friendship’ and loyalty to Yolanda.
Mohammed is a womanizer, IMO, and he is a dirty business man. He is allegedly being sued by multiple people and I find him creepy. That’s just the way I feel and I am sure there are plenty of people who like him, but in my mind, I can almost picture him making that comment about Krupa. Whether he said it to Brandi is up for grabs.
I agree with TT that Krupa will lose. Brandi may have been an asshole for making the statement but Krupa actually sounds crazy for suing Brandi for slander because she said her pussy smelled; even crazier than Brandi.
The world has gone mad.
So Mohammed the billionaire was standing in his multimillion dollar home, having a cocktail party, drinking rare wine and thought that appropriate cocktail party chatter was to discuss the smell of one woman’s vagina with two OTHER WOMEN? Seriously?!
I would be disgusted. I sure wouldnt run on national TV and repeat it not once but TWICE.
You seem to think very highly of Mohammed.
He’s plenty capable of such talk.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
I totally believe he would have made that kind of comment about Joanna.
TT, I agree. He does seem to be exactly the type of man to say that.
Lord knows Mohammed has allegedly had enough variety of women to ascertain odoriferous from unscented. Allegedly (we have a few mutual friends) he’s a great guy in many ways, but a real dog when it comes to women. Allegedly! I’ve heard alleged stories. I could see some talk happening.
I believe men say the grossest things about women. It is called locker room talk. I can see any man saying it to another man. If Brandi said she heard him say that to his male friend then yes, I would believe it. At a cocktail party full of people and to say it to Lisa who he very much admires and respects, no. I think he would want to appear very much the gentlemen…whether he is or not.
If you can post the dates and times I will be there in a fucking second.
I doubt it will get that far, Pysch. I may fly out myself if it does.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
We should all consider ourselves lucky to never have the misfortune to come across Brandi Glanville in real life. I know that had she not driven a wedge between Kyle and Kim that Kim would still be an alcoholic but she may not have imploded.
I would like to see Brandi learn her actions have consequences. And the money goes to help animals. Fine with me. I will root for the dog shelters rather than more money spent on those cheeks that look like they are storing nuts for the winter.
I don’t see how anyone can determine the level of stinky-ness of a vagina that would be tantamount to being offensive in a court of law in the first place. Stink will have to be defined here. There are plenty of things that people eat (including vaginas) that are veritably repugnant. There are cheeses, fruits (dorian) that would rival the funkiest of vaginas. How can you ask the court to determine what is stinky to anyone including vaginas that would rise to the level of a litigious offense. You stink I stink we all stink. It is far to subjective and I’m shocked that any lawyer thought it was actionable. It really boils down to sticks and stones. It’s almost like saying someone said I was ugly and now I’m going to sue them for slander. Sure, it’s an offensive thing to say, but, Brandy. Perhaps Joanne came from somewhere where funky vaginas is the ultimate shaming insult. The way she’s responding makes you wonder. This goes beyond frivolous and I would love to see the looks on the judge’s face when he has to hear this. He/she could take all of 5 minutes before they’re all their asses are thrown out of the courtroom.
Excellent point! What is stinky to one person may not be to the next. I’m a big ol’foodie but I cannot tolerate the smell or taste of truffles. I bought was apparently some great Truffle Salt in France on vacation and gave it all away to other foodie friends most of which lived it only one other didn’t as did I.
That said..’smell’ can be subjective. Can you really sue someone who says you stink? Maybe you do stink to them. Another person at the same time may say you don’t stink. Hmmm…
Ohhh I love truffle salt. Love.Truffle.Salt.
Besides why is Joanna worried about it? Unless she doesn’t have regular sex with her husband (at least not often enough for him to notice a smell or not) or is worried about a loss of future (cough) clientele allegedly.
Lord please!!! Take me now
Ask him me for me too.
hahahahahaha I can’t handle this mess.
I’m praying to the Bravo gods that Joanna continues on with this fruitless task. I hate her so much.
To me.. Joanna is going to make her PAY.. LITERALLY.. with the attorney she hired.. then switched to a pro bono lawyer… but any money that Joanna can get Brandi to spend will soften the blow of being ridiculed all over the networks… Brandi i would think would need to show a history of slander.. ex. lisa vanderpump and her talking about their bankruptcy which never happened. I DON’T BELIEVE 1 WORD from Brandi and i’m glad she has to take some of her day and appear in court.. she never shuts her damn mouth and i don’t blame Joanna for suing her for slander.. afterall she used a multi-millionaire’s “heresay” to attack Joanna … i personally don’t believe Mohammed said a word about it.. Brandi once again stirs the pot and WILL DO ANYTHING for attention. She’s a known Liar.. i hope she does have to pay … and Joanna can donate the $ to animal shelters… Brandi needs to be accountable for her insane life… geesh
What should a Vagina smell like?
Apparently CaliSteve sunshine, roses and Summer’s Eve lol.
Sugared lilacs, ancient bourbon, Bergdorf’s perfume aisle, sweet, glittered unicorn breath mixed with heather, diamond encrusted sweet peas, heated hollyhocks, hot muddled cocoa, minted emeralds, cosmic lavender, ripe nectarines of the Gods and hot spiced honey.
Any other questions, Stevie?
Lmao okay Maisey so I missed a few but you missed unicorn fur and frog legs.
Oops again you did say unicorn breath so I’ll have to change mine to sweet newborn puppy breath.
Good Cod! I fish this was televised, I would totally tuna in. Once again, Brandi plays koi with the truth as this red herring flounders in the courts.
And I really trout that Krupa will just skate by taking the stand. On that perch, she may have an “ahi moment” that she is in as deep waters as Glanville.
What a load of Karp.
Okay……I admit…..that smelt.
I must say that was creative!!! Pretty good. 🙂 Now we need a mermaid to narrate all of that. lol
Just call Joanna Chicken of the Sea. Very funny Maisy.
Maisey, you never fail to make me laugh! The Whiff and White Croakers are fish too, dammit!
Maisey you are sick twisted fuck… and hilarious. I like you.
Why, thank you. Thank you very much.
TT, posts like this keep me reading even if i dont watch. The judge would have to allow questions of odor because it central to the case, wouldnt they? Watch this live might be more entertaining than a Snow White defense was
I wonder if the on I ‘did’ back in the 70’s was sour and that’s what turned me gay.
Omg, LOL!
Who knows sequoia. You think? Lmfao. I know on the one occasion when I was sitting beside a female and could smell hers, it gagged me enough to get up and move. So…
If we knew what Mohammad’s proclivities were after the alleged smelly kitty incident, we’d have our answer.
If something slanderous is said, does it matter if it’s true or not?
nope, but you have to prove, have proof you were damaged in some way. Not just that you are mad or your feelings are hurt.
Me. Krupa will never be the poster girl for Summers Eve
You can’t slander someone with the truth…
So does it really matter if Joanna’s lady parts smell bad? Isn’t it important that something inflammatory was said? I mean, it’s so ridiculous to try to prove/disprove this statement. The slander is that it was said. Sometimes slanderous statements can have a modicum of truth, but I don’t think it being true makes it ok to say.
Just wondering.
Tanya, I think looking up the definition of slander in a dictionary would help your confusion. It would be a good starting point anyway.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
Tamara, perhaps you’re right! I really don’t want to ask my conservative late-60s lawyer uncle what he thinks…
That seems excessive when a dictionary would do.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
oops I was wrong. I was wrong assuming that damage was the only criteria. I forgot the words had to be false.
I looked it up. Now I understand. I can’t believe how stupid this is, on both their parts!! I do hope Brandi gets a lesson on shooting her big mouth off, though.
The Honorable Judge Judy presiding.
Ms Glanville I’ve read your defense and I am not going to let you and your internet lawyer make a mockery of my courtroom. Do you have any witnesses that can testify that Ms Krupka had an affair and broke up a marriage or that will testify to the vile things you’ve said on national TV. (turns to Bert) Bert, it is so disgusting that I wont repeat it.
BG: Ummmm…er…no, no your honor.
JJudy: Ms Krupka, I understand that both of your witnesses will testify that neither heard or said this statement. (Ms Krupka nods yes).
Judge: (loudly) I find for the plaintiff. Ms. Glanville you opened your big fat mouth where you shouldn’t have. It seems you do that often. Even if I believed you, which I dont. There is something called slander and if you had half a braincell you woundnt have repeated it..let alone thinking you were being cute saying it on national tv!! You will pay 10 thousand to a charity of Ms. Krupka’s choice. I want a hand written apology to Ms Krupka on my desk by noon tomorrow for the humilation and stress you caused her. Bert will make sure she receives it. GAVEL COMES DOWN. Now all of you get out of my courtroom! Next case!
I went to the coast today & for some reason it reeked of dead fish. It’s making this story particularly unpleasant tonight. Sigh.
Totally Team JoAnna. At least she had the courage to stand up BG.
BG’s lawyer is simply trying (and succeeding) to be an asshole. The questions will never be allowed.
BG has to prove that Mohammed SAID such an awful thing. Her problem is that she said the Lisa Vanderpump had overheard it. Having both of them deny it was ever said is pretty damning to BG.
I think JoAnna will win and BG will declare bankruptcy to avoid payment and then go whining after her ex husband to pay her bills. Except she’ll call it “supporting the children”, something she has never seemed to care about.
I wonder if they will use Krupa’s need for more sex & Ramon’s lack of desire storyline in court. This explains why his lap of interest & low sex drive. Sadly though, this was more likely a medical condition she was experiencing at the time. She probably had a communicable disease or yeast infection of some sort that needed to be remedied.
You are assuming that because BRANDI GLANVILLE said it, it’s true.
Most things said by that irritating giraffe are entirely false. BG and the truth haven’t been close for a long long time (if ever)
You gotta know Roaman’s likely going…. Honey, can you just let this go? It’s embarrassing.
I just remembered, the lawsuit is in Miami. I can definitely go to that. I wouldn’t even have to stay over night.
Also, I think the laws in Florida are better for the plaintiff. California is much harder to prove a slander case against public figures because they would be in court all day. I forget the details exactly but I looked into when I first found out he case was being tried in Florida.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
You know Joanne should just sue for harrassment instead.
Oops ooh am falling off the spa table reading this hilarious story. This case needs a special spin on bravo because I will be watching with a bowl of ice cream. Both ladies are not the only folks crazy but the lawyers as well for taking on the case. What’s happening to the noble profession ?
Shouldn’t Joanna be suing Mohamed instead of Brandi since he is the one who originally said it?
Does anyone know if there are any anti SLAPP laws in the state where this lawsuit was filed? I am really not sure if it would apply to this case even if there was, but wouldn’t Joanna have to prove more than if her privates were stinky, but that there was malicious intent in saying so (which I imagine is pretty hard to do)? Wouldn’t anti SLAPP laws protect someone giving their opinion about a celebrity, even if it’s distasteful and then Brandi would be able to recover the cost for her attorney fees to defend against a bs lawsuit? If someone knows more about this I would appreciate if they could explain because I’m rather ignorant about the subject.
The suit is filed in Florida. They do have an anti Slapp law in place. Not sure how broad it is. Joanna has a better chance in Floriduh than CA but I think she knows she has no case.
I almost imagine the late Johnny cockran standing before the jury proclaiming if the vagaina smells you must acquit.
I keep seeing the headline news: “KRUPA TWAT FOUND “NOT SMELLY”!! Defendant ordered to do 100 hours of community service cleaning zoo elephant dung. Defendant lawyer set to appeal. Sorry this thread is making me drunk.
Just in case it doesn’t smell the day of court doesn’t mean it didn’t smell when Brandi made the statement. Good luck Jo-ho