A few hours ago, I was perplexed and trying to figure out a few things about today’s court ruling regarding Bobbi Kristina’s situation. Why are both attorneys so happy that they are making a joint statement? Bobby wanted to keep Krissi on ice for years and the Houstons wanted to let her go. And yet Bobby now shares the decision with Pat on when to pull the plug. Everybody was concerned about money, and yet they seemed thrilled a random attorney now controls Bobbi Kristina’s finances, whatever they maybe.
Everyone claimed to be thrilled with the outcome and I thought that was just a bunch of crap. But the resident expert on this situation at TT has explained it all. It all makes sense now. What really happened today is that they agreed on a division of monies, including the undispersed funds from Whitney’s estate. They have agreed to divide the booty and finally let Bobbi Kristina go. While this is not something that can be proven now, it is the only thing that makes sense. So, you can expect for Bobbi Kristina to finally be freed to go on to the next life or whatever you believe in, soon.
TamaraTattles.com commenter 2CanPlay who has been very knowledgeable on this throughout the process, even when I refused to believe that a father and grandmother and aunt could be all about the money at the expense of Bobbi Kristina. 2CanPlay has been right the entire time. Click through for the breakdown.
According to 2CanPlay the theory goes like this.
I think a financial deal was made and they will jointly “decide” to remove the trach and let her be declared legally dead. IMHO – behind the scenes – they found a lawyer that they BOTH agreed to manage the estate – because it will be better to keep it all together – and pay out the respective parties a % accordingly each month (i.e. if they did not keep it together- then how do they decide who gets what in terms of WHs likeness etc. And yes I realize they spoke of BKs likeness – but the real $$ is in WHs likeness and future royalties).
I also think that BB had to agree to this co-guardianship arrangement in order for it to occur. More specifically, I am thinking that both sides AND their lawyers had a meeting – approached the judge with the settlement agreement and the judge then mandated what both sides agreed to (i.e. the kind of thing that sometimes occurs in child custody cases).
I assert the above because there is NOT a legal reason to give PH a co-guardianship title – unless BB agreed to it. I believe the reason BB agreed to it is because the $$ split AFTER she dies is to his liking AND it removes the possible bad publicity towards BB – if he ALONE made the decision to pull the plug AFTER trying to get a hold of her money and FAILING to do so- i.e. the already inherited portion and the yet to be inherited portion- in other words – it removes the stench of – oh well I tried to get it all…but I have bills to pay NOW so I ALONE will remove her and collect what I can NOW
Time will tell. If BB appeals the ruling then I am wrong. If BK is shortly taken of off life support/trach removed – then I am likely correct about the financial settlement and behind the scenes agreement of BB to let PH be named co-guardian.
That makes it all make sense to me. And you? Thanks so much @2CanPlay for sharing expertise with us and answering our questions throughout this entire situation.