File this one under another ridiculous housewife lawsuit. Joanna Krupa is threatening legal action against Brandi for saying that she slept with Mohammed Hadid while he was married to Yolanda Foster and that her pussy is malodorous on WWHL. I know what you are thinking. It has to do with first amendment rights, correct? I mean I get the whole slander thing but if they seriously go to court, and Brandi or a lawyer for Brandi shows up IN FLORIDA (which is odd because don’t both Brandi and Joanna live in the LA area? ) they first must prove that what Brandi said is not true. Will the judge or jury have to participate in a smell test? And didn’t Brandi say she got the information from Yolanda? That the reason she was avoiding Joanna at the upfronts was because Yo did not want to be around the woman who Mohammed cheated on her with? Will Mohammed have to be called as a witness to deny sleeping with Mohammed? Could Brandi call a laundry list of people who claim to have slept with her starting with that Girls Gone Wild guy? How will this work exactly?
That said, it seems that Brandi didn’t learn from her first legal wrangling caused by her reckless mouth. This is exactly what Adrienne Maloof did a couple seasons ago. Oddly, Lisa just apologized to Adrienne this season for running her mouth about Adrienne using a surrogate to have her boys. That one never went to court, most likely because it was true. Will this one make it onto a docket in Florida somewhere?
Click through for the letter from Joanna’s attorney. It’s a doozy.
What follows is the document from TMZ.
Dear Ms. Glanville:
Please be advised that I represent Joanna Krupa and her husband Romain Zago in her/his/their actions against you for slander, libel, defamation and/or intentional infliction of emotional distress. As you are aware, on November 11, 2013, on Bravo’s, Watch What Happens Live, you falsely accused Mrs. Krupa of having sex with Mohamed Hadid while he was in an intact marriage to Yolanda Foster (i.e. adultery) and that Mohamed Hadid told you that Mrs. Krupa’s “p—sy smelled,” claiming that such was the truth and that Lisa Vanderpump was there when Mr.
Hadid said such to you. At the time you made the false and malicious statements on national and international television, including such being published and broadcast in Florida, you knew your statements were false and that such were damaging and humiliating to Mrs. Krupa and/or her husband and subjected Mrs. Krupa and/or her husband to hatred, ridicule, contempt and/or injury to her/his/their reputation. In fact, shortly after you publicized your untruthful and malicious statements nationally, internationally and in Florida, Mr. Hadid, Mrs. Foster and Mrs. Vanderpump publicly confirmed that your statements were false.
Despite your initial knowledge that your statements and innuendos were false and even after Mr. Hadid, Mrs. Foster and Mrs. Vanderpump publicly confirmed your statements were false, you again published additional false statements on December 16, 2014, on Bravo’s Clubhouse, Watch What Happens Live’s YouTube Channel. On Florida, national and international media, you again falsely stated that Mrs. Krupa’s vagina was of bad odor asking Andy Cohen, in relation to Mrs. Krupa, if he got food poisoning from bad sushi and ending your statements by saying that Mrs. Krupa is stunning, “you can’t help the odor situation.” Again, you knew your statements were false and that such were damaging and humiliating to Mrs. Krupa and/or her husband and subjected Mrs. Krupa and/or her husband to hatred, ridicule, contempt and/or injury to her/his/their reputation.
Moreover, it appears you make false statements about Mrs. Krupa to make yourself marketable and to associate your name with a celebrity in an attempt to “tag” yourself with her for media and personal searches and/or to create a brand for yourself for monetary and attempted celebrity status. Your statements are malicious and knowingly false.
This letter serves as notice of Mrs. Krupa and/or her husband Romain Zago’s intent to proceed with civil prosecution against you for libel, slander and defamation as required by Section 770.01, Fla.Stat., and for an apology and retraction relative to Section 770.02, Fla.Stat.
PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND BE ADVISED THAT ANY FURTHER AND ADDITIONAL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE BY YOU ABOUT MRS. KRUPA SHALL BE PROSECUTED AS ADDITIONAL CAUSES OF ACTION AGAINST YOU AND/OR UTILIZED TO PROVE ACTUAL OR CONTINUED MALICE.