Sadly, Sherri Shepherd’s relationship woes and custody issues continue to escalate as TMZ is reporting today that not only is her current estranged husband, Sal suing her for custody of their unborn baby, but her ex-husband is also suing for full custody of their son Jeffrey. The bombshell of the story is that her ex-husband Jeff Tarpley filed for custody of Jeffery BEFORE either Sal or Sherri filed any paperwork, according to TMZ. This does not bode well for Sherri.
That said, the reasons that Jeff Tarpley lists as needing an emergency modification of their custody agreement seem a bit flimsy. Jeffrey was a premature baby who had to fight for his life when he was born. I am not aware of his specific special needs but Sherri has spoken about them on many occasions. He has overcome so many odds to develop into the kid he is today. It is unfair of his father to suggest that Sherri is a bad mother because as his paperwork suggests Jeffrey “can’t tie his shoes” or reads “at the second grade level.” Children with learning disabilities to not progress at the same rate as other kids. There are plenty of 9-year-olds who read at the second grade level that do not have his congenital issues. He also suggests that his hygiene skills are lacking. Perhaps there is more too it than that, but having taught 9-year-old boys, I can tell you that a lot of them have poor hygiene. It’s called being a nine-year-old boy. His case is best made by pointing out that Sherri works a lot and according to him leaves him with “unqualified nannies.” 
I realize that Sherri has a lucrative and busy career, as do many women who are exceptional mothers. However, children with special needs require A LOT of personal attention and care. Young boys need a father figure. Now that Sal is no longer around to provide that role, perhaps it is in the best interest of the child to let the parent with the most time to give their child take full custody. That said, I have a suspicion that Sherri’s ex probably has no idea the amount of energy it takes to raise a special needs child. Perhaps he should be careful what he asks for.
Four years ago, Jeff Tarpley posted an open letter to Sherri. It was rather lengthy, but well-written. In the letter he essentially asked her to please stop her FIVE YEAR tirade against him on The View and her other public outlets. He suggested is was harmful to his career (actor/comedian). Below is an excerpt from that letter.
“Sherri’s career has sky-rocketed, and regardless of how she’s unfairly treated me publicly, I truly wish her the best. She is, after all, the mother of my son. I’ve owned up to the mistakes I’ve made and I never claimed to be perfect. All I ask is that that she no longer dwell on the past; and instead, let’s move on with our lives while providing our son the best possible care. Can you imagine if I were the one with a hit daytime talk show and trashed her at every available opportunity; or created a character in a sitcom for the sole purpose of attacking her reputation? I know Sherri, and she would have spoken out well before year five; probably before hour five.
“The issues in our marriage that Sherri continually refers to happened around the time that Jeffrey was born. One thing Sherri never can deny nor has denied is the deep love and close bond I have with our son. Jeffrey will soon be socializing and interacting with other children, and eventually he will be able to search the Internet, where he’ll find article after article and countless video clips of his mom exacting a public revenge against his dad. Jeffrey does not deserve to grow up knowing that his mom used her notoriety to paint an inaccurate picture of his dad for the world to see. If not for me, it’s time to move on for the sake of our son.”
The judge denied Jeff’s request for an emergency order; however, he has set a hearing for July to rule on the matter.
As I shared previously, Sal filed for separation in California and planned to file for divorce once his residency has been re-established. Despite being underemployed or unemployed in recent years, he has hired a very high-powered California attorney. Sal is asking for primary physical custody of their unborn child which is due to arrive in July. He is also asking to have the prenuptial agreement thrown out based on fraud. The fraud allegations are usually due to the belief that one of the parties did not accurately list all of their assets.
Sherri filed for divorce in New Jersey days after Sal filed for separation. It appears from her filing that the custody of their as yet not conceived child was determined in the prenup. I’ve never heard of such a thing but, I’m not a prenup attorney. Those documents probably have all sorts of odd provisions. It also says that the only pay out to Sal would be $60K
Meanwhile, Sherri has given no indication that there is any sort of problems at home. But she did recently remove her wedding ring and no longer wears it on the show.
UPDATED POST:
According to TMZ shortly after Sal and Sherri married, Sal requested she sign this addendum to the prenup
— “I respect my husband’s opinions and recognize him as the leader of our home. I will always speak well of my husband.”
— “I enjoy having sex with my husband. I crave intimacy with him and want to be uninhibited and free in our lovemaking.”
— “MY BODY IS IMPORTANT TO ME. I STRIVE TO MAINTAIN A HEALTHY BODY WEIGHT AND EXERCISE AT LEAST THREE TIMES A WEEK.” (HIS emphasis)
— “It is my joy to submit to my husband as a way to honor God.”
Sherri refused to sign. Sal contacted TMZ to deny such an event took place and told TMZ “We had a lot of love in our marriage. I still love her. To no one’s fault, at some point, we started to view marriage differently. I refuse to let her friend’s, advisors, hanger-on’s and the media sullen those memories.”
Read more: http://www.tmz.com#ixzz32006U7Vz
Again, due to the sensitive nature of this custody issue, disrespectful comments will not be posted.
Have no idea exactly how badly it ended with the ex-husband Jeff but he makes a good point. If it was a man doing it, we’d call him a bully.
The View gives me a headache but I feel for anyone going thru custody battles. Poor kid!!
I really feel sorry for the kid. Even if he is somehow shielded from all the negativity, when he goes to school, no doubt other kids will use this to pick on him. Parents who are celebrities need to be aware of what they are saying in public.
I don’t know if that is true. If Sherri got pregnant by another man while he was raising their son, I don’t think many people would judge him for talking about it on a forum like the view.
This is really sad. I hope they are able to work things out, one way or another. Poor kid, he’s so innocent in all this.
EDITED BY TT:
You may or may not be a fan of Sherri’s but I specifically asked you not to be disrespectful in this post. Yet you choice to be a cunt satchel. Please fuck off.
What makes my skin crawl is him filing to throw out the prenuptial agreement based on “fraud”. Can he make it any more painfully obvious why he married her in the first place.
I find it interesting that if a man leaves a marriage where children are involved people are up in his face about what is enough child support and questions of his involvement in the children’s lives. If he attempts to seek custody – apparently demonstrating a willingness to be the primary caregiver with all the attendant cost and responsibility – people get up in his face that he is some sort of evil taking the child from the mother. As a woman, I HATE that we have set it up so the poor guys can’t win. If the two children involved here are being sought out by the fathers then maybe we need to think twice about holding “someone” blameless.
I’m not trying to hold anyone blameless. I said that perhaps due to her first child’s special needs perhaps it would be in the best interest of the child to give the father primary custody. Or perhaps she could make some changes to her lifestyle to allow her to spend more time with her child.
I think at least from my perspective, both men were not as financially stable as the mother. I totally understand a father wanting to sure that their child has been cared for. I think the entire situation is sad and the fact that two men have applied for full custody within weeks of each other is alarming. Either both are in collusion, or there is a serious issue with regard to the child’s care. Without any more information that what we have, I have suggested that we be respectful of all parties involved as the courts work to resolve this.
I find it odd that so many people choose to respond with a bunch of vitriol about the mother and then saying they are worried about the children.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
Unless there is more to the story than her child’s reading level and having a body odor then there is no apparent reason why Sherri’s child will be taken from her or denied custody of her unborn child. Judges do not look kindly on spouses who are purposely trying to take each other to the bank! These men need to continue to be fathers and work to support their children just like Sherri is doing her part. This is nothing but acts of revenge and greed! I hope Sherri gets it this time and never puts her name on a marriage license again.
I hope their lousy attorneys get not one penny of Sherri’s money as payment for their fees.
But since we don’t know the circumstances of the surrogacy of the second child – what if her present husband was a “donor” towards the creation of the child but she was not. In that case, why should she be the preferred parent – not being genetically involved?
Sherri froze her eggs after the last divorce. However, even if they were not viable or she had not done that, she is the legal mother and the surrogate has no rights and is merely an womb for hire.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
I did not mean to imply the surrogate had any rights (I used to work in the legal field). I was implying that if her husband donated the sperm but she did not donate the egg then he should have more rights to the child than she.
That is not how the law works though.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
“ if her husband donated the sperm but she did not donate the egg then he should have more rights to the child than she.”
If that is true, than by the same token she should not be asked to pay child support.
I hope Sherri prevails in both cases. Sherri has been raising her son all this time and he should not be removed from her custody unless their is some type of abuse established. Some 9 year olds smell and others don’t develop until much later, it’s hard to get a 9 year old to understand the concept sometimes. Sal signed the prenup and he should be held to it. If the prenup was faudulent, he should not have signed it.
Um the whole concept of fraud is that the person was deceived before signing…
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
LOL
He had an oppurtunity to seek a lawyer. She did not give it to him on the day of the wedding and make him sign it. He is just making excuses. If he cannot read, then he probably has a case!
Or if Sherri deliberately withheld assets from the prenup list of assets, it could be thrown out. I would assume that will be his allegation.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
Is her first husband at least earning a reasonable living? I know Sherri said in the past she had to pay him alimony, or something along those lines. I am guessing it had a time limit. I hope he doesn’t want full custody of Jeffery so he can ask for big child support that he and his wife will live on.
Sal sounds like a huge mistake.
If the question of a parent or parents earning a reasonable living would be applied throughout the population, We’d be overwhelmed by the numbers of children being removed from their families with hopes of being placed with families of financial means. I prefer to use love and caring as the standard rather than money.
Children are taking from families that can’t afford them all the time. You must be able to provide adequate food and shelter and access to education or DFACS will take the kid. Not sure what that has to do with this other than Sal is unemployed.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
My point was that before I was going to be completely suspicious her X wanted the boy full time, and therefore, child support for his own living expenses, I was curious did the man need money. This would be less likely to be a scheme to fleece Sherri and use his son to do it, if he had his own coin. I hope he is not a deadbeat Dad looking for a sack of gold with the poor kid in the bottom of the bag.
I’m not convinced the EX HUSBAND is a bad guy and he may simply be unaware of the hardships involved in raising a special needs kid ( or the joys for that matter). I think he perhaps just doesn’t “get it” with regard to his son’s developmental delays and may perhaps be blaming Sherri.
Or just as likely, he does get it and thinks that Sherri is neglecting his son’s needs by not providing adequate support.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
I hope Sherri and Jeffrey come out winners. Those men just want to continue to get a bigger piece of Sherri’s money. Big Sal haven’t worked since he got married. Now they do have a point Sheri has a lot of jobs. It seemed like everything the view had that required traveling Sherri was picked or volunteered to do. Remember when Elizabeth was on I often wondered why does Sherri continue to except these jobs Elizabeth
could have shared the load. I did not understand but most of that time Sherri was single. I think Sherri ‘a friend should have vetted Sal more since she introduced them. I hope the judge rules in her favor and maybe she can slow down but we all understand you have to strike while the fire is hot when it comes to your career you can be up today and forgotten about tomorrow.
Not a fan but she’s both of their cash cow right now. Sherri has many hats in the air so perhaps time with her son has been sacrificed for success. Men do it all the time. Wonder why shared custody is not on the table and why both men are going in so hard? Something else is going on and I’m sure it will be uncovered, especially with all the vultures circling covering Barbara’s departure.
AGAIN, with the “not a fan,but” It’s really not necessary.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
I find it necessary to draw clear sides, otherwise there are accusations of “Stanism” if you agree with some TV personalities that may not be popular to the masses on a blog.
Andy had Tam OC & Dr Drew on his show. Tam expressed concern that her X was filing for full custody of the children. Drew seemed confident in his statement to her to worry not… in CA courts, custody is not removed from a mother. The courts just don’t do that. To my knowledge, the only way CA will terminate custody or parental rights, is if they have a long, well documented paper trail of abuse. Their mission is diligence in keeping families intact. What we have here is a case of don’t climb too high, because we will collect when we bring you down.
On another note TT: You are giving your reader base a good lesson in Women Helping Women… We ARE our greatest resource. Love Sherri or not, if we support allow men to do this to her, we also support… it to being done to us.
If this man (soon to be ex) felt that sherri was a unfit parent..then why go through the process of having a child (via: surrogate)? I’m just saying!
If ex father felt as if his sons’ progress hasn’t been good where has he been at? Why come out the wood work now?
All of these are accusation that have yet to be proven…He only trying to sway public opinion about her and set up the “stage” for her to loose custody of both children.
I hope that has a great support system, and that she hires a top notch lawyer.
Ok, let me make sure I fully understand this situation. Jeff Sally cheats on Sherri while she is pregnant and going through severe complications with her pregnancy. He gets the mistress pregnant and has the AUDACITY to ask HER for alimony. OMG!! Alimony to support himself, the pregnant mistress and the child he is having when he cheated on her. Wow…what cojones.
Every month she is writing a check to him to support his mistress and their child for five years and counting. He has the audacity to tell her to stop bad mouthing him…for telling the TRUTH about him living off her?? What am I missing here? Is alimony coming to an end so now he wants custody so he can continue to support himself, the mistress and their child?? Did he just notice his son’s body odor after all these years? Coincidentally just when the second husband decides he wants to void the prenuptial, have custody and alimony?? The deadbeat is still not working…then again he is working..on ALIMONY and taking her for all she’s worth…
And that is the story you know. But let me assure you, there is always more to any story.
Sometimes the wife/mother presents the most perfect image to the public. Everyone loves and admires her. Yet, behind closed doors she is the spouse who is the abuser. She beats the husband and children not only with her fists but any available object. She mentally abuses everyone in the family in ways you cannot imagine. Don’t for one minute think women are always angelic.
I don’t know the truth of the lives of Sherri and her husbands and children but I know the truth of my life and I know how wrong the outside world can be simply because they don’t know the truth. Don’t make assumptions in favor of the woman. It ain’t always what it seems.
All of this is purely accusation that have not been proven.
But! If he had concerns of her being an unfit parent,and he has been married to her for a while. Then why go through the process of having a child with her (via: surrogate?) I mean wouldn’t you want to get far away from a horrible person, but instead you decide to have a child with a person that will keep you attach for 18 years ( cha ching!)
Secondly: Why file in California instead of NJ your home state?
The timing of it all it seems fishy,and it don’t adds up
With all due respect this is not speculation. It is a FACT that he cheated on her while pregnant. A FACT that he impregnated the woman he was having an affair with. It is a FACT that instead of getting a regular job and supporting his baby mama, himself, his BABY and let’s not forget Jeffrey Jr he asks for ALIMONY. Now Sherri needs to do what she needs to do whether travel etc to keep her job to pay him enough money to support SHERRI, pay for special schooling for jeffrey, child care, pay for JEFFREY SR, BABY MAMA and BABY. He hasn’t had a job in five years.
Now THIS is speculation. He sees hubby number two about to pull a big Sal and get a big chunk of alimony by filing and figures he needs to get custody to continue getting a piece of the pie before number TWO gets all the money. Sherri isn’t a developmentally disabled tutor. How is her not working or travelling going to help jeffrey?? Who files for custody before a child is born? So women with high powered jobs can’t work.
Jeffery Sr. Filed first.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
Is the mistress insisting that he marry her? They do have 2 kids together now, 8 and 3. Once he marries, the alimony stops….right? So, if he gets full custody of their son…the child support payments start in place of the alimony. Child support payments from a celebrity…means a good life for the mistress and their kids. Everybody has their agendas, I don’t believe these smoke screens.
Philly. I understand what you are saying but if the human animal was that simple a lot of problems would be solved or never arise in the first place. The complexities of relationships seldom if ever result in such easy answers as “just walk away”. The heart and head are in constant war. And sometimes (I can vouch for this) the woman simply does not carry the child nurturing gene while the man sees children as the wealth of the earth. The traditional roles are not always followed.
All I ask is to consider that things may not be as they seem.
I think most of us have not taken a side, in fact I said that two men making the same claim separately is problematic. It seems like Frappe, is projecting her own experience on to this one despite non of us having the facts.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
However Nene is exactly what she seems! Lol (needed to lighten it up).
He filed in California because that is the 50/50 state makes since to me if you are looking for a big payday that is the place to be. Put a child in that equation and he hit pay dirt that is why Wendy always tells the ladies have a baby and you are attached for life. If he gets custody then Sherri will be obligated to pay child support and alimony.
Forgot to add that Sherri’s wealth has definitely increased since they have been married so all that will be based on how much she accumulated since the marriage.
Apparently prenuptial states he only gets 60k in the divorce. He must want a bigger payday. Moving to CA to get residency to challenge the prenuptial agreement is a lowdown thing to do.
She may have suspected the low-down was there hence the 60k pre-nup. After all it doesn’t appear the man has had a viable career in a bit. Friends don’t let friends marry deadbeats IF they can prevent it. I believe she met her husband through introduction by a friend’s husband. Now I’m giving the friend’s husband the side-eye (and the friend may be also)
My sincere congratulations to those of you who lived the Leave It To Beaver life with a doting mother. I know it’s hard to see life through any other prism because of that. I will bow out now and let you flog the fathers and hail the mother. Take no notice that two TWO MEN question Sherri’s ability to care for children. All men are liars, cheats and hate children unless there is a payday attached to the child. All women are perfect in every way.
I can only speak to my views. I am not flogging the fathers but a gold digger is a opportunist, man or woman. Without the facts supporting her being unfit, these two look like they came with shovels and buckets for their haul based on what IS being reported about them. I agree everyone doesn’t have the same childhood but that doesn’t negate the ability to see that there is another childhood scenario Scars run deep and I hope yours continue to heal.
I’m thinking that if there were more than the reading issue & the BO, it would have been listed in the complaint & these seemed minor issues wouldn’t have even been mentioned. But who knows? I guess we’ll see. Seems petty to me.
Once more with feeling the unborn fetus has a mother, Sherri and a father, Sal regardless of the genetic makeup. However Sherri has stored her eggs since her last divorce.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
OMG go to this link to read the whole addendum Sal wanted her to sign,,,,
http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0516_sherri_shepherd_full_except.pdf
Um that’s crazy to even imagine. Wow.
Was Sal a member of some kind of religious sect?
So she can’t gain weight and has to submit sexually and work out three times a week—since he can’t control her income he must control her soul.
Gross. I would definitely dump my theoretical fiancé if he ever tried to put that in a prenup. I especially enjoyed the activities part. Ridiculous.
I wonder how they got this! I always thought Sherri looked more attractive than big sloppy looking Sal. I thought he looked fat, not just big build. I hope he had to sign a similar agreement including that he would be a provider. That is usually expected by the conservative crap this sounds like to keep women down.
TT do u know when this addendum was presented to Sherri? I wonder how long ago he revealed his…odd expectations of her. #understatement
Was her refusal to sign this the reason why he turned on her…allegedly?
I think it was early on. While TMZ calls it an addendum to the prenup, I think it was more of a personal, clearly not legally binding, document. I actually know people who negotiate such things in writing privately.
My jaw is on the floor. What the heck is this addendum?
Addendum to what?
I believe the friend that introduced them has bragged of having this type of agreement with her husband (who is the friend of Sal). Maybe Sal figured birds of a feather…guess he miscalculated.
I understand her ex husbands frustration with her impacting his public image but ultimately I feel it’s the long price he has to pay. Ultimately we have no control over the path our exes lives take. Anyone can become a public figure and they have ownership of their story. If morality isn’t enough of a drive to handle the decline of a relationship properly maintaining ones name and dignity should be. And although it may be frustrating for him to have to relive his choices, it was his choices that ultimately hurt his son the most, not Sheri sharing it thru whatever talk/creative mediums.
I went to the site and read the addendum Sal expected or hoped Sherri would sign. This is stepford wife language. I don’t watch the view and it does not have any effect on this court action, but I like her. I have a special needs grandson and most people have NO idea that it is terribly hard, especially when earning the money needed for constant therapies and care. I have helped a great deal, but worried many times that my daughter would break from the pressure. It is a day to day life. Then, add in having to stay relevant to keep and get jobs. I wish her and her children Gods care and love.
I’m not sure why you’d automatically take her side. I’ve heard her speak about the child and she has never impressed me as a good mother. Sak’s claims may be completely accurate.
She’s the mother whose only child almost died in child birth was in NICU for months and she talks about him all the time on The View to the point where Barbara tries to limit her stories about how much she loves him, on many shows to one or two?
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
That doesn’t make her a good mother.
Sounds like he should have married Dr. Heavenly that sounds like the terms of her marriage 🙂
My son is 9-year-old gifted child and his hygiene is disgusting. I have to make him retake his showers; he’s not allowed to ever take his shoes off in the car because his feet smell so badly, and I made the dentist give him a good talking to about brushing his teeth. Ugh. 9-year-old boys are disgusting. I can’t wait until he discovers girls and start caring about what he smells like.
Good point. Boys aren’t the best when it comes to hygiene however wasn’t that sally or the responsibility of the Nanny if she was working to keep a roof over everyone’s head. One would think a private conversation about changing nannies or getting extra tutoring would have been an option…
Does anyone know how much she pays her ex Jeff tarpley in alimony and when it runs out? We are about to hit the 10 year mark if Jeff Jr is 9 years old. Does his alimony run out in 10 years? Also does he work? Does his new wife/baby mama have a job? Or is his alimony permanent?
I was thinking this too. Him and his girlfriend have two kids together and she must be pressing him to marry her.
I know the current husband moved from NY to CA and wants residency to file for divorce there. What grounds is he asking for custody for since the child has not been born so he can’t cite neglect. I wonder if he was he one that told Jeff about Sherri being neglectful so his case has more merit. Supposedly kids learn to tie at 4 to 5 years old. If the child is 9 then why hasn’t he noticed it sooner? Also why is ex #2 seeking to invalidate on fraud for a 3 yr marriage? CA is a 50/50 state so I guess he wants half of her fortune…
Jeffery was born very prematurely, almost died and has several learning disabilities as a result. The fact that he has fine motor skill problems in not a sign of neglect.
Also Jeffery’s father has remarried which would end his palimony.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
Thanks for the clarification, TT. I don’t think it is a sign of neglect either…
Oh,okay…he has already married her! I didn’t know they had married.
Heck, I have a relatively mild learning disability, but it involves math and spatial awareness and I was unable to tie my shoes until I was 10. I just could not figure out how to make it work on my own. I still can’t do basic math and have my partner figure out minor fractions and addition and subtraction for me. Just about the only thing I can do is know how to multiply something by 2 and get a correct answer, all the rest is guesses and memorization. I certainly would not expect a regular 4 or 5 year old to tie shoes (my nephews are that age and they do not have the ability to do it yet), let alone one with learning disabilities.
Hi TT, one of my comments is on moderation. Did I do something wrong??
Probably not, WordPress is very inconsistent lately.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
There Is a story on the web where #1 was interviewed with his lawyer. He was a no show but they interviewed his lawyer Mr folkes. I found it interesting that Folkes points out that Jeff tarpley and lamar Sally have a “great relationship and will be one of his key witnesses”. Also Sherri does continue to pay tarpley child support. Can we say tag team anyone?
Why would Sherri pay child support? She has full custody of Jeffery and always has.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
I read it in an article today on one of the gossip sites. It may be incorrect.
Tarpley filed first. If he wins Salley can motion for the infant in family law court and request alimony, child support and request a portion of her estimated 10 million net worth. My hunch is that Salley went to Tarpley under the guise of helping Jeff Jr because he need tarpley to win to invalidate the prenuptial. Whether Tarpley is genuinely concerned or sees an opportunity for increased child support I can’t say but it is hard to give him the benefit of the doubt…
If Salley files and wins costody in CA, then Sherri will have to make arrangements to see her child in CA. Sherri currently lives in NY. Unless Sherri did something awful and there is documented evidence, I don’t think either one will win. Stranger things have happened. I am sure Sherri has a good lawyer. I would think in terms of the divorce, they would go by NY, the state they were married in and primary residence for the couple. I think Sherri filed for divorce. I wonder why, when she is out of town, Tarpley is not allowed to take care of him? It sound like the Usher/Tameka custody battle.
Sherri filed for divorce in NJ where she lives. This is nothing like the Usher case. Sherri and Jeffery live in NJ. The men all live in California. How would …oh nevermind.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
Today on The View Sherri and Jenny did their hot topics. At the end, Jenny did a bit about two couples who were separating, Jenny said, these things always happen in threes. I think there was another couple on TMZ that were splitting up this week…hmmmm who could that be? Sherri said, no, no, I am sure there are only two… Jenny says, “wait I remember now!” and Sherri says, “And that concludes today’s hot topics!”
It was kind of funny. Sherri seems to be fine.
@Tamara I thought she lived in NY. I thought Tameka had primary custody of the children and Usher sued her and won. Now, Usher has primary custody of the children.
You people and your net worth information crack me the fuck up. Seriously?
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
Sorry, TT. I have seen it reported from various sources that she is worth an estimated 10 million. I know you once said that many of these sites don’t know I have also seen it happen where one source reports something and everyone picks it up. If you know that it is wrong then I stand corrected. I know that not everything that is printed is accurate….
Please familiarize yourself with the commenting rules.
http://s17948.p858.sites.pressdns.com/commenting-rules/
Particularly #3 and #10.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
Hi TT, just read the rules and took note of #3 And #10. Apologies, will be sure to be more mindful of the rules!
Thanks Josie!
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Tamara Tattles wrote:
>
isn’t this the lady who thinks the world is flat? if so,custody to the father(s) please! give her a plant to raise not a human who needs some real skills to live a decent life.