Do some of you tattoo lover wanna tell me who the large tattoo on the woman's arm is? Because… LAWD. I know you younguns is all tatted up but I'm not a fan of tats on chicks. Love em on a manly man though. 🙂
What's up Bobbi? Look like you left out one very important person in this family photo. Dont start trippin, alright, it's still much too soon. Man-it-up; she still needs you dummy boy. Do the right thing, please!Thanks!LannetteP.S. I hope there's another photo of at least you and her that I just aint seen it yet, fingers crossed, but I dont think so!
It has been reported that Bobbi Kristina wasn't at the wedding for whatever reason. Because she's not in this picture isn't indicative of anything really. 1) His other children were at the wedding and are not in this picture. 2) Its a picture of him, his new wife and the little ones in the wedding party (including their young son, the ring bearer). Its a standard will picture that many wedding photographers capture.
Okay now you done said something. BK not in THIS specific picture, you are right, DOES not indicate a problem. Like you said, different types of photos captured are the norm at most weddings. On the other hand, BK NOT in attendance at the wedding DOES support what we were all told by Whitney and BK in 2009 of Bobby’s inability to Man-it-up and be there consistently for BK. No need to go back and forth about one minute aspect of a much bigger issue. Thanks for your opinion! Thanks!Lannette
Absolutely NOTHING!
Bobbi Kristina??
Who are all those kids? I'm just sayin
His brown Brown's are missing.
Do some of you tattoo lover wanna tell me who the large tattoo on the woman's arm is? Because… LAWD. I know you younguns is all tatted up but I'm not a fan of tats on chicks. Love em on a manly man though. 🙂
What's up Bobbi? Look like you left out one very important person in this family photo. Dont start trippin, alright, it's still much too soon. Man-it-up; she still needs you dummy boy. Do the right thing, please!Thanks!LannetteP.S. I hope there's another photo of at least you and her that I just aint seen it yet, fingers crossed, but I dont think so!
It has been reported that Bobbi Kristina wasn't at the wedding for whatever reason. Because she's not in this picture isn't indicative of anything really. 1) His other children were at the wedding and are not in this picture. 2) Its a picture of him, his new wife and the little ones in the wedding party (including their young son, the ring bearer). Its a standard will picture that many wedding photographers capture.
Okay now you done said something. BK not in THIS specific picture, you are right, DOES not indicate a problem. Like you said, different types of photos captured are the norm at most weddings. On the other hand, BK NOT in attendance at the wedding DOES support what we were all told by Whitney and BK in 2009 of Bobby’s inability to Man-it-up and be there consistently for BK. No need to go back and forth about one minute aspect of a much bigger issue. Thanks for your opinion! Thanks!Lannette
Lannette-agree! KGT