![]() |
Jonathan Jaxson tweeted this picture from his hospital bed after allegedly trying to kill himself. Another publicity stunt? |
This is part four of four posts regarding this topic. Please read here, here and here to get caught up.
So just who is Jonathan Jaxson? Perhaps Kim Kardashian should have asked herself that question before she did business with him in the first place. Apparently, while he was allegedly working for Kim K as a PR rep, he was also involved in a lawsuit with Perez Hilton. Check out this info from The Smoking Gun.
APRIL 9 (2008)–Perez Hilton claims that a Florida blogger slandered him by claiming the online gossip columnist solicited sexual favors in exchange for help promoting the man’s nascent web site. In an April 8 Los Angeles Superior Court complaint, Hilton (real name: Mario Lavandeira) alleges that Jonathan Lewandowski recently told reporters that he was manipulated into sending sexually explicit videos to Lavandeira, and that the pair had sex and dated. Lavandeira, 30, charges that these claims are false, adding that Lewandowski (who uses the handle Jonathan Jaxson when blogging) has also invaded his privacy by posting his cell phone number online. In his complaint, an excerpt of which you’ll find below, Lavandeira contends that, as a result of the 24-year-old Lewandowski’s actions, he has ‘suffered loss of his reputation, shame and mortification’ and ‘mental anguish.’ Lavandeira’s lawsuit does not specify monetary damages, but seeks general, special, and punitive damages, and the reimbursement of legal fees from Lewandowski. Hilton declined comment about the lawsuit, while Lewandowski, who had yet to see the complaint, told TSG that he found it ‘hilarious’ that Lavandeira was suing him. ‘I have not lied about him. What Perez did to me was hurtful,’ he said.
The lawsuit was a result of this article that appear on page 6 of the New York Post in February of 2008.
Whoa pony – I wanna know about him and KimZ!!
Why are you water-marking someone else's photo?
So you won't steal it. 🙂
No huney, you stole it.
You are supposed to put a watermark on images that YOU own! For example-if YOU took the photo, or you purchased it from someone and owned the copyright. You took that photo from someone else. What you are doing does not make any sense, AND it is a very weird example of copyright theft.
copyright theft? lolWho's copyright?You think someone has filed for the copyright of the twitter photo? (please)
Sidenote: Why can't I right click?!? I need to read in a new tab, or I can't keep track of my posts…
valerie, the anons that don't understand why websites watermark their photos, both copyrighted and not are Branch Lynndavidians. They are also the reason I have watermarks and have disabled right click. sorry. It's just one of those cases of being inconveinced by thugs in the world. Kinda like getting felt up by the TSA because lunatics try to blow up aircraft.The story is here http://www.tamaratattles.com/2011/11/thanks-for-alerts-regarding-my-photos.htmlIt's shame that they leave the compound to come here when clearly I am doing so many things wrong. But it does wonders for my page views. 🙂
If they were YOUR photos, that would be a good reason to watermark. But you TOOK them from someone else.I understand perfectly well why someone would try to secure what THEY OWN. What I don't understand is WHY you would label someone else's material with YOUR brand???!!!I don't know what a BL is, but for someone who claims to be concerned with copyright, and content-theft, watermarking property that does not belong to you, is not only insane,but your ignorance is spreading confusion, and mis-information.
Do shut tup. And go away.
This comment has been removed by the author.
I'm pretty sure it's that i hate jill whatever place that steals from other blogs. This is not that site. Iff you want to discuss bunyons or your cat's bowel movements, that's probably the place for you. But if you want hot gossip from the blogger who gets it first and gets the exclusive stuff straight from the source (and therefore gets to watermark it)- enjoy the stuff here!
Wow. Anon sure is worked up over some pictures of some obscure person. I guess its true that if you don't have a leg to stand on you end up on your ass. Sorta like anon did up there.
I saw this photo without a water mark on http://realityfamecheck.blogspot.com since taken away, along with all the Kim K proof still up.
Photos posted online are public property, Dipshit. Look it up. The watermark merely identifies who is posting it – IF THEY SO CHOOSE. WD
I see the Flying Monkey's from Pork Barrels site are still alive, well and Wrong as ever.If the photos are all over everyone else' site and "not watermarked" tell Pork Rind to steal them from there.Tamara doesn't feel like writing and substantiating Pork Rind's site…got it?
um, watermarking and copyrighting are two different things, although watermarks may also be used to enforce copyrights.I'm not sure you this Pig person is you're referring to, but she needs higher class or at least better educated minions.
what is the obessesion with Lynn Hudson? It's so weird.The issue that anon brought up was valid. Why watermark another person's photo and present it as your own so that people won't steal it when in fact, you stole it in the first place? That shows how shady Tamara really is. I also find Tamara to be a bit racist. I love that she is above going to Peter's club because she would stick out but she has no problem digging into people's background and saying borderline racist things. Talk about hiding behind your computer…This is my final stop at this blog.And people who disagree with
This Jonathan Jaxson fool is a man not to be trusted.
Sure, I like hearing the tea, but imagine if you hired this guy?
This same guy is writing a tell about Kim Zolciak, spoke up about Amanda Bynes and someother crazy shwang.